From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: Tracking files across tree reorganizations Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 17:02:13 -0800 Message-ID: <43A0C095.20708@zytor.com> References: <43A08B8F.1000901@zytor.com> <20051214223656.GJ22159@pasky.or.cz> <43A0AE6B.3040309@zytor.com> <7vd5jzurfi.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Dec 15 02:03:23 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EmhVw-00021S-9x for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 02:02:32 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965134AbVLOBC3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:02:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965137AbVLOBC3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:02:29 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([192.83.249.54]:34968 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965134AbVLOBC3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:02:29 -0500 Received: from [10.4.1.13] (yardgnome.orionmulti.com [209.128.68.65]) (authenticated bits=0) by terminus.zytor.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBF12Iej021396 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 14 Dec 2005 17:02:18 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: Junio C Hamano In-Reply-To: <7vd5jzurfi.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87.1, clamav-milter version 0.87 on localhost X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on terminus.zytor.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano wrote: > "H. Peter Anvin" writes: > > >>HOWEVER, I maintain that this is unnecessary (and, as Linus has pointed >>out several time, losing) -- we already detect renames without relying >>on commit-time metadata. If it's too expensive to generate the metadata >>on every merge, it can be cached. > > > I agree; I was wondering why you brought it up again. > Just because of Petr's comment about adding stuff to commit messages. -hpa