From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [PATCH] Stgit - gitmergeonefile.py: handle removal vs. changes Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 11:23:05 +0000 Message-ID: <43BFA499.3020202@gmail.com> References: <20051113194225.20447.57910.stgit@zion.home.lan> <200512301859.51000.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jan 07 12:23:17 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EvCAC-000439-Gy for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 12:23:12 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030413AbWAGLXJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jan 2006 06:23:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030414AbWAGLXJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jan 2006 06:23:09 -0500 Received: from mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.48]:37822 "EHLO mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030413AbWAGLXI (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jan 2006 06:23:08 -0500 Received: from aamta09-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20060107112307.UGCV17804.mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamta09-winn.ispmail.ntl.com>; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 11:23:07 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.101] (really [81.104.194.137]) by aamta09-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20060107112307.FHLN10196.aamta09-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@[192.168.1.101]>; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 11:23:07 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051013) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: Blaisorblade In-Reply-To: <200512301859.51000.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Blaisorblade wrote: >The original patch hasn't been merged, nor (for what I see) anything else to >fix this problem has been done. > > Indeed, I forgot about it. >I assume the patch was lost waiting for the discussion to settle down, but the >patch can be merged, even changing the default choices in any way (see >below). > > I merged it as it is. I will think about the default options once I get some time to fix the .local, .older and .remote extensions (give them some meaningful names). >Also, another note: I just found Bruce Eckel mentioning pychecker, which is a >static code checker for Python (to perform the checks a compiler would >normally do). I've not the time to investigate more myself, but I hope it can >be useful to you. > > Thanks. I'll give it a try. Catalin