From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lamikr Subject: Re: [ANNOUCNE] GIT 1.1.0 Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:55:14 +0200 Message-ID: <43C2F7E2.4090909@cc.jyu.fi> References: <7v4q4eurgu.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <43C2CAED.8030304@cc.jyu.fi> <7vwth9f1nk.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Reply-To: lamikr@cc.jyu.fi Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jan 10 00:49:44 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ew6lf-0004de-3Z for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 00:49:39 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750754AbWAIXtb (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:49:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751265AbWAIXtb (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:49:31 -0500 Received: from posti5.jyu.fi ([130.234.4.34]:2177 "EHLO posti5.jyu.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750754AbWAIXtb (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:49:31 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by posti5.jyu.fi (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k09NnP2S007684; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:49:25 +0200 Received: from aragorn.kortex.jyu.fi (aragorn.kortex.jyu.fi [130.234.182.44]) by posti5.jyu.fi (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k09NnLKU007679; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:49:22 +0200 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (aragorn.kortex.jyu.fi [127.0.0.1]) by aragorn.kortex.jyu.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A4E468169; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:55:14 +0200 (EET) User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-7.2.20060mdk (X11/20050322) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: Junio C Hamano In-Reply-To: <7vwth9f1nk.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cc.jyu.fi Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: >Ah, sorry, and thanks for catching this. RPM building procedure >is somewhat tricky, and I failed to catch this bug. Fixed in my >tree --- this calls for an early 1.1.1 release I guess. > >On the other hand, if you are building from the source, what >Andreas said applies, and in addition you need to fetch v1.1.0 >tag before building; otherwise the versioning mechanism would not >notice you are building v1.1.0. > > I was not using git for fetching git sources, I have build from the git 1.1.0.tar.bz2. Did you mean that things should work after 1.1.1 is released? I tried to fresh build and install of 1.1.0 on top of the previous 1.1.0 build but "git --version" is still displaying me "git version 1.0.GIT" Mika