From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Molton Subject: Re: Handling large files with GIT Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:17:57 +0000 Organization: The Dragon Roost Message-ID: <43F113A5.2080506@f2s.com> References: <46a038f90602080114r2205d72cmc2b5c93f6fffe03d@mail.gmail.com> <87slqty2c8.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <46a038f90602081435x49e53a1cgdc56040a19768adb@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ben Clifford , Martin Langhoff , Florian Weimer , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 14 00:20:14 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F8mzN-0001Qt-E6 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:20:14 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030272AbWBMXUJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:20:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964883AbWBMXUI (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:20:08 -0500 Received: from outmail1.freedom2surf.net ([194.106.33.237]:45219 "EHLO outmail.freedom2surf.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964875AbWBMXUH (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:20:07 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (i-83-67-116-184.freedom2surf.net [83.67.116.184]) by outmail.freedom2surf.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k1DNEnVT020789; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:14:49 GMT User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051219) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds wrote: > Taking advantage of those kinds of things is what makes git good at > handling software projects. But it wouldn't necessarily be how you lay out > a mail directory, for example. An automated file store might want to > spread out the changes on purpose. Indeed... Im curious as to why anyone would want to use a SCM tool on a mail dir anyway - surely no-one edits their pasnt mails and needs to keep logs? surely incremental backups would be a better way to manage something like this ?