From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Biesinger Subject: Re: [RFC] So... are people happy with commit/status -v? Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 16:18:59 +0100 Message-ID: <43F88C63.3020100@web.de> References: <7vvevhj6x4.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Feb 19 16:19:17 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FAqLE-0001i4-Rt for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2006 16:19:17 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750837AbWBSPTG (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Feb 2006 10:19:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750781AbWBSPTG (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Feb 2006 10:19:06 -0500 Received: from smtp08.web.de ([217.72.192.226]:37828 "EHLO smtp08.web.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750837AbWBSPTE (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Feb 2006 10:19:04 -0500 Received: from [85.124.21.143] (helo=[192.168.1.42]) by smtp08.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (WEB.DE 4.105 #340) id 1FAqKy-00056w-00; Sun, 19 Feb 2006 16:19:00 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de-AT; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20051213 SeaMonkey/1.5a To: Junio C Hamano In-Reply-To: <7vvevhj6x4.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-Sender: cbiesinger@web.de Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano wrote: > I usually never do commits from a subdirectory, also I rarely do > partial commits, so this is not a big issue to me, but are > people happy with the current commit/status? The part that annoyed me most was that "git-status --only ." completely ignores the specified path and tells me about the whole tree, rather than just the current directory and subdirectories. While I think I'd prefer it if the commands limited themselves to the current directory by default, I don't mind the current behaviour, as long as I still have the possibility to limit to the subdirectory.