git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Tapsell <johnflux@gmail.com>
To: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: git checkout -b origin/mybranch origin/mybranch
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:36:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43d8ce650903120436u261cb7e3p838e4a12e7b54d7d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hey all,

  One of my collegues did:

git checkout origin/somebranch

  git complained that they need to specify the name with -b.  So they did:

git checkout -b origin/somebranch origin/somebranch

  Git accepts this with no problems, but boy - all hell broke loose.
Doing a push or pull gave errors, because "origin/somebranch" is now
ambigous (since there is two of them).  They can't even:  "git
checkout -b somebranch origin/somebranch"  anymore, since
"origin/somebranch" is ambigous.  It all got into a mess.

  I've sort it out now, but I'd like to request that git doesn't so
easily let the user shoot themselves in the foot.

  I propose that creating a branch called  "origin/*" or "remotes/*"
gives at _least_ a warning, and preferably an error (overrideable with
--force for people who really really want to do it)

John Tapsell

             reply	other threads:[~2009-03-12 11:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-12 11:36 John Tapsell [this message]
2009-03-12 11:40 ` git checkout -b origin/mybranch origin/mybranch Sverre Rabbelier
2009-03-12 11:43 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-03-12 11:48   ` John Tapsell
2009-03-12 13:02     ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-03-12 13:18       ` John Tapsell
2009-03-12 13:43         ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-03-12 14:14           ` John Tapsell
2009-03-13 14:08             ` Michael J Gruber
2009-03-12 15:21           ` Pieter de Bie
2009-03-12 15:37             ` Jeff King
2009-03-12 16:16               ` John Tapsell
2009-03-12 16:35                 ` Jeff King
2009-03-12 16:40                   ` Pieter de Bie
2009-03-12 16:51                     ` Jeff King
2009-03-12 16:58                       ` John Tapsell
2009-03-12 17:14                         ` Jeff King
2009-03-12 17:45                           ` John Tapsell
2009-03-12 16:45                   ` John Tapsell
2009-03-12 18:31         ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43d8ce650903120436u261cb7e3p838e4a12e7b54d7d@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=johnflux@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).