From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Tapsell Subject: Automatically remote prune Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:42:52 +0000 Message-ID: <43d8ce650911040242l44bbf87dm35494e04ce9039aa@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 To: Git List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Nov 04 11:43:12 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N5dKY-00010q-WA for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:43:11 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755262AbZKDKmr (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 05:42:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755256AbZKDKmr (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 05:42:47 -0500 Received: from mail-pz0-f188.google.com ([209.85.222.188]:54568 "EHLO mail-pz0-f188.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755141AbZKDKmq (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 05:42:46 -0500 Received: by pzk26 with SMTP id 26so4604921pzk.4 for ; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 02:42:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=wyA4lLGx9o4dzgFkygH1an40zfLPP95UOaB7ZvWrcmg=; b=F3s4sY1G+Y/bNX7ZSHSydcz+ooOcJ1BqBjfSukD4bxxSL0+XgimT6PITjT7rRv2c6b ii1F1Kp5mnqBPUjZQ4o0NXhxeo3LGFc+CKd2U1tJD4r5weHKzlNTJkxSx8fy6A71aF/t HS4q1+3wigf+IKwXS3zmwHEDS/8REP5usgSzo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Z7SSNaxiBqttZ0H2azYfmwzRahiiP6I+2MVLgp6avybTtolJpWjchWby1txz1t92/r iZmDouTSvIP7hk/G/aaPceJop7ferSJCOLA0hJ2zrW0JaH5eTOA59vjXx+etiYLmOuDF 2ZEhuIoBf6HgURm19gg7T4twqYo31WAp6sJHA= Received: by 10.114.253.23 with SMTP id a23mr1751583wai.155.1257331372136; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 02:42:52 -0800 (PST) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi all, Is there any particular reason why "git update" doesn't automatically remove remote branches that have been removed on the server? I keep getting questions about this from confused users. If there's strong resistance against that (there usually is for changing any default behaviour), could we at least mark deleted branches? So maybe: $> git branch -r origin/blah1 [Deleted] origin/blah2 (Some branches have been deleted on the remote server. Use "git remote prune origin" to remove these) Or something. John