From: Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
To: Matthias Kestenholz <lists@spinlock.ch>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: git-fetch per-repository speed issues
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 14:05:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44AA5987.5060206@op5.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060704111838.GA4285@spinlock.ch>
Matthias Kestenholz wrote:
> * Andreas Ericsson (ae@op5.se) wrote:
>
>>Keith Packard wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 20:40 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> "And, it's painfully slow, even when the repository is up to date"
>>>>
>>>>and gave a 17-second time.
>>>
>>>
>>>It's faster this evening, down to 8 seconds using ssh and 4 seconds
>>>using git. I clearly need to force use of the git protocol. Anyone else
>>>like the attached patch?
>>
>>Since it changes the current meaning of ssh+git, I'm not exactly
>>thrilled. However, "git/ssh" or "ssh/git" would work fine for me. The
>>slash-separator could be used to say "fetch over this, push over that",
>>so we can end up with any valid protocol to use for fetches and another
>>one to push over.
>>
>
>
> If we would do such a thing, we would be probably better off
> allowing different URLs for pushing and pulling, because the git and
> ssh URLs will only be the same, if the git repositories are located
> in the root folder and I suspect that's almost never the case.
>
True. We use relative paths where I work, so for us either way would
work. Your way is better though.
--
Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@op5.se
OP5 AB www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-04 12:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-03 18:02 git-fetch per-repository speed issues Keith Packard
2006-07-03 23:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-04 0:21 ` Jeff King
2006-07-04 1:22 ` Ryan Anderson
2006-07-04 1:44 ` Jeff King
2006-07-04 1:55 ` Ryan Anderson
2006-07-04 3:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-05 6:47 ` Jeff King
2006-07-05 16:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-04 6:44 ` Jakub Narebski
[not found] ` <1151973438.4723.70.camel@neko.keithp.com>
2006-07-04 3:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-04 3:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-04 3:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-04 4:30 ` Keith Packard
2006-07-04 11:10 ` Andreas Ericsson
2006-07-04 11:18 ` Matthias Kestenholz
2006-07-04 12:05 ` Andreas Ericsson [this message]
2006-07-04 4:02 ` Keith Packard
2006-07-04 4:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-04 5:05 ` Keith Packard
2006-07-04 5:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-04 6:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-04 5:29 ` Keith Packard
2006-07-04 5:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-04 15:42 ` Jakub Narebski
2006-07-04 16:30 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2006-07-04 17:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-04 19:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-04 21:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-06 23:36 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44AA5987.5060206@op5.se \
--to=ae@op5.se \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists@spinlock.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).