From: A Large Angry SCM <gitzilla@gmail.com>
To: Josef Weidendorfer <Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de>, git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Additional merge-base tests
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 07:28:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44ABCC89.2090003@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200607051039.53288.Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de>
Josef Weidendorfer wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 July 2006 23:15, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
>>
>>> We could introduce a time.maximumSkew variable, and just walk only
>>> that much further when traversing the commits.
>> We could have had "commit generation number" in the commit
>> object header, and use that instead of commit timestamps for
>> these traversal purposes.
>
> Isn't this "commit generation number" information that can be
> regenerated on the fly, i.e. a perfect fit for data to be stored
> in a persistant cache, e.g. in ".git/tmp/virtual-commit-timestamps"?
Yes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-05 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-04 3:55 [PATCH] Additional merge-base tests A Large Angry SCM
2006-07-04 5:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-04 6:41 ` A Large Angry SCM
2006-07-04 7:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-04 7:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-04 8:23 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-04 10:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-04 11:16 ` Jakub Narebski
2006-07-04 11:35 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-04 11:40 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-04 20:18 ` A Large Angry SCM
2006-07-04 21:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-04 22:25 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-04 22:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-04 23:07 ` A Large Angry SCM
2006-07-04 23:14 ` Jakub Narebski
2006-07-04 23:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-05 0:26 ` A Large Angry SCM
2006-07-05 0:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-07-05 7:56 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-05 16:15 ` A Large Angry SCM
2006-07-05 17:04 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-07-05 8:39 ` Josef Weidendorfer
2006-07-05 14:28 ` A Large Angry SCM [this message]
2006-07-04 20:08 ` A Large Angry SCM
2006-07-05 0:59 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44ABCC89.2090003@gmail.com \
--to=gitzilla@gmail.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).