From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alp Toker Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix some doubled word typos Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 02:42:43 +0100 Message-ID: <44B1B093.9000201@atoker.com> References: <11524377844177-git-send-email-alp@atoker.com> <44B1A01F.5090408@atoker.com> <7vodvye10h.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jul 10 03:43:24 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fzknj-0002W9-Co for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 03:43:07 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964965AbWGJBmu (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jul 2006 21:42:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964976AbWGJBmu (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jul 2006 21:42:50 -0400 Received: from host-84-9-44-142.bulldogdsl.com ([84.9.44.142]:38669 "EHLO ndesk.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964965AbWGJBmu (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jul 2006 21:42:50 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ndesk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 543234B2B2; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 02:42:44 +0100 (BST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060516) To: Junio C Hamano In-Reply-To: <7vodvye10h.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano wrote: > Actually, I am a bit more careful than that ;-). > > I have split your patch into two, and applied the part that > applicable to "master" first. The tip of ew/svn topic branch (I > do not publish topic branch tips) have two patches that are > still not in even "pu", and one of these two patches is your > Documentation/git-svn.txt patch. These two will appear in > "next" hopefully soon -- I just haven't gotten around to them. I hadn't realised that git-svn work was happening on a topic branch. In light of that, it makes perfect sense to split out the commit as you did. It's good to hear that git isn't just truncating patches. Cheers.