From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alp Toker Subject: Re: [PATCH] Install built-ins as symlinks Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 15:58:28 +0100 Message-ID: <44B3BC94.3000204@atoker.com> References: <11526131782190-git-send-email-alp@atoker.com> <11526131781900-git-send-email-alp@atoker.com> <1152613179634-git-send-email-alp@atoker.com> <11526131791902-git-send-email-alp@atoker.com> <11526131792773-git-send-email-alp@atoker.com> <11526131792377-git-send-email-alp@atoker.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 11 16:59:01 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G0Jh3-0001n8-1a for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 16:58:33 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750951AbWGKO6a (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 10:58:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750965AbWGKO6a (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 10:58:30 -0400 Received: from host-84-9-44-142.bulldogdsl.com ([84.9.44.142]:65294 "EHLO ndesk.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750949AbWGKO63 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 10:58:29 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ndesk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 796C91645A1; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 15:58:28 +0100 (BST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060516) To: Johannes Schindelin In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin wrote: >> Doing this now will save headache in the long run, avoiding mismatched >> versions of installed utilities and dangling copies of removed or >> renamed git commands that still appear to work. It also makes screwups >> when packaging git or making system backups less likely. > > Could we please fix things, which are broken? Not things which work? There are maybe a dozen arguments for and against the use of symlinks here, some of which Andreas has helpfully explained in his reply. You, on the other hand, have managed not to mention a single one of them. If you don't have the technical background to review a certain patch, please don't add to the noise.