From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: git-clone failures abound Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 00:38:46 -0400 Message-ID: <44C6F1D6.5020208@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "David S. Miller" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jul 26 06:39:04 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G5bAl-0001zK-N5 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 06:39:04 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030379AbWGZEiu (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2006 00:38:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030380AbWGZEiu (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2006 00:38:50 -0400 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:61581 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030379AbWGZEiu (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2006 00:38:50 -0400 Received: from cpe-065-190-194-075.nc.res.rr.com ([65.190.194.75] helo=[10.10.10.99]) by mail.dvmed.net with esmtpsa (Exim 4.62 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1G5bAV-0003Jz-SB; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 04:38:48 +0000 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060614) To: Git Mailing List , Junio C Hamano , Linus Torvalds X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.1.3 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.3 points, 5.0 required) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: I've been seeing several reports lately, from different users on various Linux platforms, with the same basic bug report * "git:// clone of linus's repo times out after 10 minutes" * someone says, "use rsync:// for the initial clone" * "it works, thanks!" People seems to note that this behavior only started recently. I wonder if linux-2.6.git crossed some sort of size threshold that's too much for kernel.org CPU load to bear? I wonder if git-clone is attempting to delta-ify, when it really should just be sending the objects in bulk? Jeff