From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Shearman Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-sh-setup: Fail if the git directory was not found. Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 12:52:36 +0100 Organization: CodeWeavers Message-ID: <44DF1284.5080406@codeweavers.com> References: <44DC4C92.5060009@codeweavers.com> <7vfyg2sxrk.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vlkpuragp.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Aug 13 13:53:39 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GCEX5-0007RK-FR for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 13:53:31 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751002AbWHMLxO (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Aug 2006 07:53:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751016AbWHMLxO (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Aug 2006 07:53:14 -0400 Received: from mail.codeweavers.com ([216.251.189.131]:15503 "EHLO mail.codeweavers.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751002AbWHMLxN (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Aug 2006 07:53:13 -0400 Received: from host86-139-253-196.range86-139.btcentralplus.com ([86.139.253.196] helo=[172.16.0.10]) by mail.codeweavers.com with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1GCEWi-0005yk-Sp; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 06:53:09 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.8 (X11/20060725) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: Junio C Hamano In-Reply-To: <7vlkpuragp.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano wrote: >Junio C Hamano writes: > > > >>Moving the assignment of GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY is fine, but >>changing it to an unconditional assignment is wrong. The user >>can have a GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY set independently from GIT_DIR >>(or ../some/where/.git that is detected). >> >> I'm not an expert in shell scripting so I didn't notice that it was a conditional assignment. >How about this as a replacement? > > Looks good. Thanks, -- Rob Shearman