From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rene Scharfe Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add git-zip-tree to .gitignore Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 00:34:51 +0200 Message-ID: <44F21E0B.9010600@lsrfire.ath.cx> References: <44F17FD5.2030000@lsrfire.ath.cx> <7vlkp9x2b9.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Aug 28 00:35:09 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GHTDc-0002xl-4V for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 00:35:04 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751240AbWH0Wez convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:34:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751242AbWH0Wez (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:34:55 -0400 Received: from static-ip-217-172-187-230.inaddr.intergenia.de ([217.172.187.230]:16013 "EHLO neapel230.server4you.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751240AbWH0Wey (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:34:54 -0400 Received: from [10.0.1.3] (p508E7AB6.dip.t-dialin.net [80.142.122.182]) by neapel230.server4you.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBFD636011; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 00:34:52 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) To: Junio C Hamano In-Reply-To: <7vlkp9x2b9.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano schrieb: > Although it was my fault applying it already to "master" without=20 > asking this question first, I started to wonder how many more archive > format people would want, and if it might make more sense to > consolidate git-*-tree into a single frontend with an option to > specify the archiver. >=20 > We would obviously need to keep git-tar-tree as a backward=20 > compatibility alias for "git archive-tree -f tar", but doing things > that way we do not have to introduce unbounded number of new > git-{zip,rar,...}-tree programs. That thought occurred to me, too. I guess there are not that many more interesting archive formats, though. Can we defer adding git-archive-tree until a third archive format command appears? I won't submit another one, I promise. ;-) Ren=E9