From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Whitcroft Subject: Re: On blame/pickaxe Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:15:01 +0100 Message-ID: <453393E5.3020203@shadowen.org> References: <7vr6xddm7h.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20061016022159.GZ20017@pasky.or.cz> <7v8xjgvjys.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <200610161602.49811.Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Junio C Hamano , Petr Baudis , Luben Tuikov , git@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Oct 16 16:15:49 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GZTFn-0000jU-VX for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:15:44 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932092AbWJPOPl (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Oct 2006 10:15:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932093AbWJPOPl (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Oct 2006 10:15:41 -0400 Received: from hellhawk.shadowen.org ([80.68.90.175]:58128 "EHLO hellhawk.shadowen.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932092AbWJPOPl (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Oct 2006 10:15:41 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by hellhawk.shadowen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GZTF5-0007zj-UC; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:15:00 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060812) To: Josef Weidendorfer In-Reply-To: <200610161602.49811.Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Josef Weidendorfer wrote: > Hi, > > this blame-passing thing really looks very promising and powerful. > > On Monday 16 October 2006 08:43, you wrote: >> If the user is not prepared to see code movement, pickaxe can be >> run without -M nor -C to get the classic blame output. > > Another blame-passing heuristic would be very interesting for code: > "Ignore white-space changes". > This way, commits which only do some reindentations simply are skipped. > > It looks like such a thing would just be a matter of passing "-b" to > executions of "diff" in the blame-passing algorithm. I am thinking that that is probabally going to need to be optional, for example python the indentation is everything to the meaning of the code. -apw