From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Aaron Bentley Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Example Cogito Addon - cogito-bundle Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:10:20 -0400 Message-ID: <45391F1C.80100@utoronto.ca> References: <9e4733910610140807p633f5660q49dd2d2111c9f5fe@mail.gmail.com> <200610201821.34712.jnareb@gmail.com> <20061020181210.GA29843@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <200610202047.11291.jnareb@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jakub Narebski , Jan Hudec , bazaar-ng@lists.canonical.com, git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Oct 20 21:11:09 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GazlY-0007vl-6V for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 21:10:48 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2992871AbWJTTK3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:10:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S2992869AbWJTTK3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:10:29 -0400 Received: from server4.panoramicfeedback.com ([66.216.124.41]:31899 "EHLO server4.panoramicfeedback.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2992860AbWJTTK1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:10:27 -0400 Received: from server4.panoramicfeedback.com ([66.216.124.41] helo=[192.168.2.19]) by server4.panoramicfeedback.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Gazl8-0004DQ-00; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:10:22 -0400 User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20060830) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 X-Panometrics-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Linus Torvalds wrote: > Git goes one step further: it _really_ doesn't matter about how you got to > a certain state. Absolutely _none_ of what the commits in between the > final stages and the common ancestor matter in the least. The only thing > that matters is what the states at the end-point are. That's interesting, because I've always thought one of the strengths of file-ids was that you only had to worry about end-points, not how you got there. How do you handle renames without looking at the history? Aaron -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFOR8c0F+nu1YWqI0RAkhJAJ9QJ3nyP/437/bNPI3VEVHZP0dEZACfZyEg SWAp+673iTDEZfH00M4RG4k= =1XO+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----