From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Aaron Bentley Subject: Re: VCS comparison table Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:47:23 -0400 Message-ID: <4540BC6B.1050009@utoronto.ca> References: <20061022185350.GW75501@over-yonder.net> <20061023222131.GB17019@over-yonder.net> <20061024002622.GC17019@over-yonder.net> <20061024163458.GH17019@over-yonder.net> <20061025002713.GN17019@over-yonder.net> <20061025235306.GD17019@over-yonder.net> <45408A53.10400@op5.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 13:48:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Matthew D. Fuller" , bazaar-ng@lists.canonical.com, David Lang , git@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20060830) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <45408A53.10400@op5.se> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 X-Panometrics-MailScanner: Found to be clean Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gd5ah-0003dd-0p for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:48:15 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161387AbWJZNsM (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:48:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161391AbWJZNsL (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:48:11 -0400 Received: from server4.panoramicfeedback.com ([66.216.124.41]:7085 "EHLO server4.panoramicfeedback.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161387AbWJZNsK (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:48:10 -0400 Received: from server4.panoramicfeedback.com ([66.216.124.41] helo=[192.168.2.19]) by server4.panoramicfeedback.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Gd5aD-0008PJ-00; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:47:45 -0400 To: Andreas Ericsson Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Ericsson wrote: > The only issue I have with bzr's revno's and truly distributed setup is > that, by looking at the table, it seems to claim that you have found > some miraculous way to make revnos work without a central server. Since > everyone agrees that they don't, this should IMO be listed as mutually > exclusive features. The "simple namespace" is both a URL and a revno. And therefore, it's just as distributed and decentralized as the web. There is very little difference between this: http://example.com/mywebpage#5 And this: http://example.com/mybranch 5 In fact, we've been planning to unify them into one identifier. Aaron -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFQLxr0F+nu1YWqI0RAiVrAJ9rb+uylIuxqMo2VMelI3Qm6oNQOwCfeTAb kOkp9kOkRl1YEVEP+G3y2SU= =Zgsg