From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Aaron Bentley Subject: Re: VCS comparison table Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:13:43 -0400 Message-ID: <4540D0A7.90706@utoronto.ca> References: <20061022185350.GW75501@over-yonder.net> <20061023222131.GB17019@over-yonder.net> <20061024002622.GC17019@over-yonder.net> <20061024163458.GH17019@over-yonder.net> <20061025002713.GN17019@over-yonder.net> <20061025235306.GD17019@over-yonder.net> <45408A53.10400@op5.se> <4540BC6B.1050009@utoronto.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:14:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bazaar-ng@lists.canonical.com, git@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20060830) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 X-Panometrics-MailScanner: Found to be clean Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gd6w2-0003H5-Di for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:14:22 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423555AbWJZPOQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:14:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423556AbWJZPOQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:14:16 -0400 Received: from server4.panoramicfeedback.com ([66.216.124.41]:44720 "EHLO server4.panoramicfeedback.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423555AbWJZPOP (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:14:15 -0400 Received: from server4.panoramicfeedback.com ([66.216.124.41] helo=[192.168.2.19]) by server4.panoramicfeedback.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Gd6vc-0002Bi-00; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:13:56 -0400 To: Jakub Narebski Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jakub Narebski wrote: > Aaron Bentley wrote: >>There is very little difference between this: >> >>http://example.com/mywebpage#5 >> >>And this: >> >>http://example.com/mybranch 5 >> >>In fact, we've been planning to unify them into one identifier. > > > Well, then it is not much simpler than 8-chars sha1. And sha1 is more > decentralized, because you can use it when you don't have access to net, > and when the _central_ revno server is down. What do you mean by _central_ revno server? example.com? Does that also apply to google.com? Aaron -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFQNCc0F+nu1YWqI0RAlslAJ0XJ8Fezxyn5Ty1oAcgAo4LdQEAvQCfbWk+ vVTmHwIuhyd7lhAxMm2uMZ8= =c4pE