From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Aaron Bentley Subject: Re: git and bzr Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:59:25 -0500 Message-ID: <456CB13D.6090407@utoronto.ca> References: <45357CC3.4040507@utoronto.ca> <456C809C.3050503@utoronto.ca> <200611281943.40354.jnareb@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 21:59:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bazaar-ng@lists.canonical.com, git@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20060926) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <200611281943.40354.jnareb@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 X-Panometrics-MailScanner: Found to be clean Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GpAzH-0001DY-0F for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:59:35 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757160AbWK1V7c (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:59:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757377AbWK1V7c (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:59:32 -0500 Received: from server4.panoramicfeedback.com ([66.216.124.41]:24512 "EHLO server4.panoramicfeedback.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757160AbWK1V7b (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:59:31 -0500 Received: from server4.panoramicfeedback.com ([66.216.124.41] helo=[192.168.2.19]) by server4.panoramicfeedback.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1GpAz9-0006hH-00; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:59:27 -0500 To: Jakub Narebski Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jakub Narebski wrote: > Well, I gues that with "annotate friendly" (weave or knit) storage > annotate/blame would be faster. But fast annotate was not one of the > design goals of git. > > How fast is "bzr annotate"? $ time bzr annotate builtins.py > /dev/null real 0m1.479s user 0m1.430s sys 0m0.030s builtins.py has 953 ancestor revisions (i.e. revisions that modified it) and 3016 lines. That's on a machine with 4141.87 Bogomips. I did optimize annotate slightly, but I'm submitting the optimization for our 0.14.0 release. Aaron -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFbLE90F+nu1YWqI0RAlkdAJ99Ca4ITlwx+TuGvBmux0HPDpx28QCfTY0h lJYpnpcpWs8SpAP31x48NF4= =EDXr