From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Nicholas Allen Subject: Re: git and bzr Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:34:19 +0100 Message-ID: <456CB96B.1030504@onlinehome.de> References: <456B7C6A.80104@webdrake.net> <845b6e870611280410j58bdcd99nc05d0f67489293e4@mail.gmail.com> <456C7592.6020700@ableton.com> <456C9DFF.1040407@onlinehome.de> <456CA981.4010808@onlinehome.de> <20061128214531.GA24299@jameswestby.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:34:34 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061115) In-Reply-To: <20061128214531.GA24299@jameswestby.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:8f68dfdb39f9894a8a7411e7c5df1048 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GpBWz-0001os-SK for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:34:26 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755795AbWK1WeW (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:34:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756360AbWK1WeW (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:34:22 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:38899 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755795AbWK1WeV (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:34:21 -0500 Received: from [84.190.155.117] (helo=[192.168.1.100]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu1) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKwpI-1GpBWt2SiQ-0000rm; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:34:20 +0100 To: bazaar-ng@lists.canonical.com, Git Mailing List Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thanks for the informative response. It helped but I'm still slightly confused by git - I think I need to play around with it a bit more to understand and get more familiar with the concepts... Purely from an initial usage point of view though, for me at least, the bzr output needed no explanation which I think is indicative of a good user interface whereas the git was not so clear or obvious - there must be room for improvement in git's user friendliness here surely. But that might just be because I am clueless when it comes to the way git works and the concepts it uses ;-)