From: Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>,
Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fast access git-rev-list output: some OS knowledge required
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 16:28:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4578330C.9070208@op5.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0612071553090.28348@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
>
>> Shawn Pearce wrote:
>>> Perhaps there is some fast IPC API supported by Qt that you could use
>>> to run the revision listing outside of the main UI process, to
>>> eliminate the bottlenecks you are seeing and remove the problems noted
>>> above? One that doesn't involve reading from a pipe I mean...
>>>
>> Why not just fork() + exec() and read from the filedescriptor? You can
>> up the output buffer of the forked program to something suitable, which
>> means the OS will cache it for you until you copy it to a buffer in qgit
>> (i.e., read from the descriptor).
>
> Could somebody remind me why different processes are needed? I thought
> that the revision machinery should be used directly, by linking to
> libgit.a...
>
You wrote:
--%<--%<--%<--
Because, depending on what you do, the revision machinery is not
reentrable. For example, if you filter by filename, the history is
rewritten in-memory to simulate a history where just that filename was
tracked, and nothing else. These changes are not cleaned up after
calling the internal revision machinery.
--%<--%<--%<--
When I wrote the above suggestion, I hadn't read the posts following the
email where I cut this text from (where Linus said "we can add a 'reset'
thingie to the revision walking machinery" and Marco replied with some
more questions).
--
Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@op5.se
OP5 AB www.op5.se
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-07 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-06 19:24 Fast access git-rev-list output: some OS knowledge required Marco Costalba
2006-12-06 19:28 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-12-06 19:34 ` Marco Costalba
2006-12-06 19:42 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-12-06 19:51 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-12-06 20:08 ` Marco Costalba
2006-12-06 20:18 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-12-07 13:25 ` Andreas Ericsson
2006-12-07 14:53 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-12-07 15:28 ` Andreas Ericsson [this message]
2006-12-07 16:01 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-12-08 18:34 ` Marco Costalba
2006-12-08 20:10 ` Michael K. Edwards
2006-12-09 12:15 ` Marco Costalba
2006-12-06 23:27 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-12-07 0:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-07 6:46 ` Marco Costalba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4578330C.9070208@op5.se \
--to=ae@op5.se \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcostalba@gmail.com \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).