git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>,
	Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>,
	Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fast access git-rev-list output: some OS knowledge required
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 16:28:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4578330C.9070208@op5.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0612071553090.28348@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>

Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> 
>> Shawn Pearce wrote:
>>> Perhaps there is some fast IPC API supported by Qt that you could use 
>>> to run the revision listing outside of the main UI process, to 
>>> eliminate the bottlenecks you are seeing and remove the problems noted 
>>> above?  One that doesn't involve reading from a pipe I mean...
>>>
>> Why not just fork() + exec() and read from the filedescriptor? You can 
>> up the output buffer of the forked program to something suitable, which 
>> means the OS will cache it for you until you copy it to a buffer in qgit 
>> (i.e., read from the descriptor).
> 
> Could somebody remind me why different processes are needed? I thought 
> that the revision machinery should be used directly, by linking to 
> libgit.a...
> 

You wrote:
--%<--%<--%<--
Because, depending on what you do, the revision machinery is not
reentrable. For example, if you filter by filename, the history is
rewritten in-memory to simulate a history where just that filename was
tracked, and nothing else. These changes are not cleaned up after 
calling the internal revision machinery.
--%<--%<--%<--

When I wrote the above suggestion, I hadn't read the posts following the 
email where I cut this text from (where Linus said "we can add a 'reset' 
thingie to the revision walking machinery" and Marco replied with some 
more questions).

-- 
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson@op5.se
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se

  reply	other threads:[~2006-12-07 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-06 19:24 Fast access git-rev-list output: some OS knowledge required Marco Costalba
2006-12-06 19:28 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-12-06 19:34   ` Marco Costalba
2006-12-06 19:42     ` Shawn Pearce
2006-12-06 19:51       ` Shawn Pearce
2006-12-06 20:08         ` Marco Costalba
2006-12-06 20:18           ` Shawn Pearce
2006-12-07 13:25         ` Andreas Ericsson
2006-12-07 14:53           ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-12-07 15:28             ` Andreas Ericsson [this message]
2006-12-07 16:01               ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-12-08 18:34           ` Marco Costalba
2006-12-08 20:10             ` Michael K. Edwards
2006-12-09 12:15               ` Marco Costalba
2006-12-06 23:27   ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-12-07  0:47     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-07  6:46       ` Marco Costalba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4578330C.9070208@op5.se \
    --to=ae@op5.se \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcostalba@gmail.com \
    --cc=spearce@spearce.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).