From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: kernel.org mirroring (Re: [GIT PULL] MMC update) Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2006 04:27:51 -0500 Message-ID: <457A8197.5090503@garzik.org> References: <457868AA.2030605@zytor.com> <20061207193012.GA84678@dspnet.fr.eu.org> <4578722E.9030402@zytor.com> <4579611F.5010303@dawes.za.net> <45798FE2.9040502@zytor.com> <457998C8.3050601@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 09:28:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Michael K. Edwards" , "H. Peter Anvin" , Rogan Dawes , Kernel Org Admin , Git Mailing List , Jakub Narebski Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061107) In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GsyV1-0005f4-Ip for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2006 10:28:03 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936595AbWLIJ2A (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Dec 2006 04:28:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S936642AbWLIJ2A (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Dec 2006 04:28:00 -0500 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:59338 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936595AbWLIJ17 (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Dec 2006 04:27:59 -0500 Received: from cpe-065-190-194-075.nc.res.rr.com ([65.190.194.75] helo=[10.10.10.10]) by mail.dvmed.net with esmtpsa (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1GsyUq-0002I9-4c; Sat, 09 Dec 2006 09:27:52 +0000 To: Linus Torvalds Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > That said, I'm not personally convinced that there is much point to using > netfilter for transparent proxying. Why not just use separate ports for > squid and for apache? That's what most people using squid in "http accelerator" mode do. They put Apache on port 8080 or somesuch. Jeff