From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: kernel.org mirroring (Re: [GIT PULL] MMC update) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:08:57 -0500 Message-ID: <457C8579.5080407@garzik.org> References: <200612102011.52589.jnareb@gmail.com> <200612102127.05894.jnareb@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:09:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Jakub Narebski , Martin Langhoff , Git Mailing List , "H. Peter Anvin" , Rogan Dawes , Kernel Org Admin Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061107) In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GtWr3-0008KD-TI for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:09:06 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756821AbWLJWJC (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:09:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757734AbWLJWJC (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:09:02 -0500 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:41269 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756821AbWLJWJA (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:09:00 -0500 Received: from cpe-065-190-194-075.nc.res.rr.com ([65.190.194.75] helo=[10.10.10.10]) by mail.dvmed.net with esmtpsa (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1GtWqw-0002us-Km; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:08:59 +0000 To: Linus Torvalds Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Sun, 10 Dec 2006, Jakub Narebski wrote: >> Well, the idea (perhaps stupid idea: I don't know how caching engines >> / reverse proxy works) was that there would be caching engine / reverse >> proxy in the front (Squid for example) would cache results and serve it >> to rampaging hordes. > > Sure, if the proxies actually do the rigth thing (which they may or may > not do) squid seems to work well as an HTTP accelerator (reverse proxy). Apache's mem|disk cache stuff fails miserably. Unfortunately squid development seems to have slowed in recent years. Jeff