From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Quy Tonthat Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-remote exclude Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 02:14:57 +1100 Message-ID: <45AE3D71.9020708@gmail.com> References: <45AA44D6.6080605@gmail.com> <200701151155.26111.andyparkins@gmail.com> <7vodp00xag.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <200701161026.49752.andyparkins@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jan 17 16:15:44 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H7CVm-0005XG-Hg for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:15:38 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751482AbXAQPP3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:15:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932270AbXAQPP3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:15:29 -0500 Received: from pecan-mail.exetel.com.au ([220.233.0.8]:41234 "EHLO pecan.exetel.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751482AbXAQPP3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:15:29 -0500 Received: from [220.233.69.95] (helo=[192.168.64.35]) by pecan.exetel.com.au with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H7CVa-00046K-G8; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 02:15:26 +1100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070102) To: Johannes Schindelin In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.1 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Fine. Submit a patch. And if that patch makes git-fetch not as fragile as > I expect it to do, I am not opposed to inclusion. I'll just not use that > feature. And I'll still find your usage confused. > I have no doubt your opposition to inclusion is important here. But some people would (out-of-fashion'ly/arrogantly/dont-care'ly) submit their patches "just for fun", as they did in the olden days. (Not that old to me though). Quy