Alex Riesen wrote:
>> okay, what do I expect when doing cd .git && git-ls-files?
>>  Either listing *all files* in the repo (like git-ls-files from the
>> repo root) or no files at all, or failure (".git is private").
> 
> List nothing. That's what it does. It could return non-0
> (which it does not), but aside from that,... looks very sensible.

yah, to fail or not to fail.  I'd still say listing in .git is invalid, hence fail.

> Alright, it is not. I can even imagine someone having a script
> containing "git-ls-files -o| rm -f; git reset --hard" to get clean 
> working dir,
> and starting the script in .git one day. Make "-o" list nothing as well?

yes, I actually wanted to talk about -o, but forgot to mention.  Following my reasoning above, it should fail as well.

cheers
  simon

-- 
Serve - BSD     +++  RENT this banner advert  +++    ASCII Ribbon   /"\
Work - Mac      +++  space for low €€€ NOW!1  +++      Campaign     \ /
Party Enjoy Relax   |   http://dragonflybsd.org      Against  HTML   \
Dude 2c 2 the max   !   http://golden-apple.biz       Mail + News   / \