From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon 'corecode' Schubert Subject: Re: More precise tag following Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 20:55:41 +0100 Message-ID: <45BBAE3D.6000805@fs.ei.tum.de> References: <7vy7nqxd08.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20070127080126.GC9966@spearce.org> <45BB5888.9020608@fs.ei.tum.de> <45BB87EB.7010200@fs.ei.tum.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig3A3906816B6BFF225C562F3C" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jan 27 20:55:51 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HAteR-0006ga-0Y for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 20:55:51 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751826AbXA0Tzr (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Jan 2007 14:55:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752371AbXA0Tzr (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Jan 2007 14:55:47 -0500 Received: from stella.fs.ei.tum.de ([129.187.54.7]:55656 "EHLO stella.fs.ei.tum.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751826AbXA0Tzq (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Jan 2007 14:55:46 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.fs.ei.tum.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3879280BF; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 20:55:44 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at fs.ei.tum.de Received: from stella.fs.ei.tum.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (stella.fs.ei.tum.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id dgSfO2cd-ilk; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 20:55:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.10.124] (ppp-62-216-202-61.dynamic.mnet-online.de [62.216.202.61]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by stella.fs.ei.tum.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8533E28084; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 20:55:44 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; DragonFly pc32; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061212 Thunderbird/1.5.0.8 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig3A3906816B6BFF225C562F3C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Johannes Schindelin wrote: > So you want to store it in a pack, fetchable? Or wherever. Main point was "reusable", but actually that depends on how= long it takes to build the cache (okay, i'll call it cache). >>> It also gives me a warm fuzzy feeling that no bogus "auxillary=20 >>> information" can be introduced by fetching from somewhere else. (It=20 >>> does not matter if intended or unintended.) >> I agree on that. >=20 > So you agree we should _not_ store it in a pack, fetchable? I agree that it had advantages if you can opt out. > So, if you _do_ have it in a pack, fetchable, what happens if you=20 > regenerated it locally, fixing a flaw, but then fetch it from somewhere= =20 > else, where the flaw possibly still exists, what do you do? the same what happens if you repack a pack locally. the pack won't be re= -fetched, thus your data won't be overwritten. cheers simon --=20 Serve - BSD +++ RENT this banner advert +++ ASCII Ribbon /"\ Work - Mac +++ space for low =E2=82=AC=E2=82=AC=E2=82=AC NOW!1 +++= Campaign \ / Party Enjoy Relax | http://dragonflybsd.org Against HTML \ Dude 2c 2 the max ! http://golden-apple.biz Mail + News / \ --------------enig3A3906816B6BFF225C562F3C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (DragonFly) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFu64/r5S+dk6z85oRApPnAKDpJwf4W4JJKfjB2PBNxF0LZOXpZwCgmQRy Ot00G5iUisRA6f6LWu7EXPY= =jG6s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig3A3906816B6BFF225C562F3C--