From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Levedahl Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-unbundle - unbundle objects and references for disconnected transfer. Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:43:13 -0500 Message-ID: <45D39081.2010709@verizon.net> References: <11714622292110-git-send-email-mdl123@verizon.net> <11714622292295-git-send-email-mdl123@verizon.net> <11714622293142-git-send-email-mdl123@verizon.net> <20070214194537.GD28290@spearce.org> <45D377A8.1080404@verizon.net> <20070214210300.GF28290@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "Shawn O. Pearce" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Feb 14 23:43:22 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HHSqQ-0000Rb-5f for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 23:43:22 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751300AbXBNWnT (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:43:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751266AbXBNWnT (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:43:19 -0500 Received: from vms042pub.verizon.net ([206.46.252.42]:30727 "EHLO vms042pub.verizon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751300AbXBNWnS (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:43:18 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([71.246.235.75]) by vms042.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JDH00KQS5S0I3K1@vms042.mailsrvcs.net> for git@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:43:14 -0600 (CST) In-reply-to: <20070214210300.GF28290@spearce.org> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > I don't really have an opinion here, as I'm fortunate enough that > I can use an SSH or an anonymous git connection between all of my > repositories, and thus don't really have a need for bundle/unbundle. > > Its just one of those operations which I thought would not happen > often, and when it did, probably would be big. In which case keeping > the packfile would make the unbundle run faster, as you don't need > to create a huge mess of loose objects. Fair enough - I've made that change, also your other suggestion about piping refs directly to pack-objects. Thanks for both. Mark