From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sam Vilain Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] Teach "fsck" not to follow subproject links Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:41:54 +1200 Message-ID: <461D6432.90205@vilain.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Git Mailing List , Junio C Hamano To: Linus Torvalds X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Apr 12 00:42:34 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HblWL-0002ms-Dk for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:42:33 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161311AbXDKWmD (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:42:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161327AbXDKWmC (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:42:02 -0400 Received: from watts.utsl.gen.nz ([202.78.240.73]:34083 "EHLO magnus.utsl.gen.nz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161311AbXDKWmA (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:42:00 -0400 Received: by magnus.utsl.gen.nz (Postfix, from userid 65534) id E3D6913A403; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:41:58 +1200 (NZST) Received: from [192.168.2.22] (leibniz.catalyst.net.nz [202.78.240.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by magnus.utsl.gen.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D341213A3E1; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:41:54 +1200 (NZST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060521) In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on mail.magnus.utsl.gen.nz X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds wrote: > Since the subprojects don't necessarily even exist in the current tree, > much less in the current git repository (they are totally independent > repositories), we do not want to try to follow the chain from one git > repository to another through a gitlink. > Does this consider the case where the intent of the subprojects are to collate multiple, small projects into one bigger project? In that case, you might want to keep all of the subprojects in the same git repository. Sam.