From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: Cygwin and git 1.5.1 Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 10:53:34 -0700 Message-ID: <4621151E.9070707@zytor.com> References: <461BCBC0.2000705@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> <461C134D.8020803@zytor.com> <46210DA4.1090600@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Junio C Hamano , GIT Mailing-list To: Ramsay Jones X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Apr 14 19:53:57 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HcmRe-0006p6-PQ for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 14 Apr 2007 19:53:55 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753232AbXDNRxv (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Apr 2007 13:53:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753878AbXDNRxv (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Apr 2007 13:53:51 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([192.83.249.54]:42671 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753232AbXDNRxu (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Apr 2007 13:53:50 -0400 Received: from [172.27.0.16] (c-67-180-238-171.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.180.238.171]) (authenticated bits=0) by terminus.zytor.com (8.13.8/8.13.7) with ESMTP id l3EHrY5t004747 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 14 Apr 2007 10:53:35 -0700 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302) In-Reply-To: <46210DA4.1090600@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.7/3091/Sat Apr 14 09:53:57 2007 on terminus.zytor.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DATE_IN_FUTURE_48_96,RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL autolearn=no version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on terminus.zytor.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Ramsay Jones wrote: > > Yes, that would work. However, I rejected this solution last time, because > I did not want to add a dependency on the C99 header files. > Having said that, that ship has probably sailed ... ;-) > If you're using uint32_t and similar types, well, then, you're using . Now, can be written up for an old compiler fairly easily. -hpa