git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
To: Luiz Fernando N Capitulino <lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br>
Cc: junkio@cox.net, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Introduces for_each_revision() helper
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:59:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46310485.8070605@shadowen.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11776168001048-git-send-email-lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br>

Luiz Fernando N Capitulino wrote:
> This macro may be used to iterate over revisions, so, instead of
> doing:
> 
> 	struct commit *commit;
> 
> 	...
> 
> 	prepare_revision_walk(rev);
> 	while ((commit = get_revision(rev)) != NULL) {
> 		...
> 	}
> 
> New code should use:
> 
> 	struct commit *commit;
> 
> 	...
> 
> 	for_each_revision(commit, rev) {
> 		...
> 	}
> 
>  The only disadvantage is that it's something magical, and the fact that
> it returns a struct commit is not obvious.
> 
>  On the other hand it's documented, has the advantage of making the walking
> through revisions easier and can save some lines of code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luiz Fernando N Capitulino <lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br>
> ---
>  revision.h |   11 +++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/revision.h b/revision.h
> index cdf94ad..bb6f475 100644
> --- a/revision.h
> +++ b/revision.h
> @@ -133,4 +133,15 @@ extern void add_object(struct object *obj,
>  extern void add_pending_object(struct rev_info *revs, struct object *obj, const char *name);
>  extern void add_pending_object_with_mode(struct rev_info *revs, struct object *obj, const char *name, unsigned mode);
>  
> +/* helpers */
> +
> +/**
> + * for_each_revision	-	iterate over revisions
> + * @commit:	pointer to a commit object returned for each iteration
> + * @rev:	revision pointer
> + */
> +#define for_each_revision(commit, rev) \
> +	prepare_revision_walk(rev);    \
> +	while ((commit = get_revision(rev)) != NULL)
> +
>  #endif

If this is constructed like that then I would expect the code below to
be miss-compiled:

	if (condition)
		for_each_revision(commit, rev) {
		}

As it would be effectivly be:

	if (condition)
		prepare_revision_walk(rev);
	while ((commit = get_revision(rev)) != NULL) {
	}

I think you'd want this to be something more like:

#define for_each_revision(commit, rev) \
	for (prepare_revision_walk(rev); \
		(commit = get_revision(rev))) != NULL); ) {

-apw

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-26 19:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-26 19:46 [PATCH 0/5] RFC: for_each_revision() helper Luiz Fernando N Capitulino
2007-04-26 19:46 ` [PATCH 1/5] Introduces " Luiz Fernando N Capitulino
2007-04-26 19:59   ` Andy Whitcroft [this message]
2007-04-26 21:12     ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2007-04-26 19:46 ` [PATCH 2/5] builtin-fmt-merge-msg.c: Use " Luiz Fernando N Capitulino
2007-04-26 19:46 ` [PATCH 3/5] reachable.c: " Luiz Fernando N Capitulino
2007-04-26 19:46 ` [PATCH 4/5] builtin-shortlog.c: " Luiz Fernando N Capitulino
2007-04-26 19:46 ` [PATCH 5/5] builtin-log.c: " Luiz Fernando N Capitulino
2007-04-26 20:57 ` [PATCH 0/5] RFC: " Hermes Trismegisto
2007-04-26 21:05   ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-04-26 21:17     ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2007-04-26 21:14   ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2007-04-26 21:21     ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-27 13:21       ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2007-04-27 17:13         ` Junio C Hamano
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-04-27 17:00 [PATCH 0/5] New " Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2007-04-27 17:00 ` [PATCH 1/5] Introduces " Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2007-04-27 19:32   ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-27 21:13     ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2007-04-29  6:59       ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-29  7:06         ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-04-30 23:19           ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-28  2:46   ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-04-28 11:50     ` Alex Riesen
2007-04-28 12:52       ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-04-28 16:02       ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2007-04-28 16:48         ` Alex Riesen
2007-04-29 13:04           ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46310485.8070605@shadowen.org \
    --to=apw@shadowen.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=junkio@cox.net \
    --cc=lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).