From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support ent:relative_path Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 11:19:42 +0200 Organization: eudaptics software gmbh Message-ID: <463AFAAE.853DEF7B@eudaptics.com> References: <463ADE51.2030108@gmail.com> <56b7f5510705040022x2e4903d3hbe4ac1ee1a2e096f@mail.gmail.com> <7v7irpuhhr.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <81b0412b0705040147h1bab8f6ao3ce2c486637a0d4f@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 04 11:19:58 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HjtxE-00041R-Dn for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 04 May 2007 11:19:56 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933045AbXEDJTx (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2007 05:19:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422881AbXEDJTx (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2007 05:19:53 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:49402 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933045AbXEDJTw (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2007 05:19:52 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Hjtx3-00056v-OR for git@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 04 May 2007 11:19:45 +0200 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 May 2007 11:19:45 +0200 Received: from J.Sixt by cm56-163-160.liwest.at with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 May 2007 11:19:45 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm56-163-160.liwest.at X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Alex Riesen wrote: > On 5/4/07, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > My preference is (2), (3) and then (1), but I do not have > > offhand a suggestion for a good metacharacter we could use. > > "./" :) +1, without the :) and ../ should DWIM, too. -- Hannes