From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?R8OhYm9yIEZhcmthcw==?= Subject: Re: FFmpeg considering GIT Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 00:10:13 +0200 Message-ID: <463FA3C5.70101@nekomancer.net> References: <20070503180016.GB21333@informatik.uni-freiburg.de> <20070503200013.GG4489@pasky.or.cz> <87y7k4lahq.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <20070505133543.GC3379@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> <17983.6136.147062.346626@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20070507175222.GA13927@efreet.light.src> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Paul Mackerras , Linus Torvalds , Karl Hasselstr?m , Junio C Hamano , Carl Worth , Michael Niedermayer , Git Mailing List To: Jan Hudec X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue May 08 00:10:27 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HlBPV-00048z-Th for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 08 May 2007 00:10:26 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966586AbXEGWKV (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2007 18:10:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S966658AbXEGWKU (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2007 18:10:20 -0400 Received: from viefep13-int.chello.at ([213.46.255.15]:25886 "EHLO viefep17-int.chello.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966586AbXEGWKU (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2007 18:10:20 -0400 Received: from omoikane.local ([89.173.70.91]) by viefep17-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.08.02.00 201-2186-121-20061213) with ESMTP id <20070507221016.WWEP18668.viefep17-int.chello.at@omoikane.local>; Tue, 8 May 2007 00:10:16 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326) In-Reply-To: <20070507175222.GA13927@efreet.light.src> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jan Hudec wrote: > On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 22:13:44 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote: >> I have thought about rewriting it in a different language, but I >> haven't found anything that really appeals. I don't want to go to >> C/GTK or C/Qt since that would make it hard to port to Windows and > > C/Gtk would be perfectly portable. As would C++/Gtk, Python/Gtk and Perl/Gtk. > C++/Qt4 would be perfectly portable as well, so choose whichever you find > easier to work with. For C/C++ they are on par, for Python/Perl/Ruby I think > Gtk has better bindings. > >> MacOS AFAIK. GTK does not work natively on OSX (it only works using the X11 server ). QT works fine. gabor