From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: MinGW port: some questions Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 09:58:23 +0200 Organization: eudaptics software gmbh Message-ID: <464D5C9F.DBA27467@eudaptics.com> References: <1179341520.31213.38.camel@bruno.nolaviz.org> <7vejlgegb9.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alon Ziv To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 18 09:58:03 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HoxLe-0004hO-Oy for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 18 May 2007 09:58:03 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755321AbXERH55 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2007 03:57:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755433AbXERH55 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2007 03:57:57 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:41431 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755478AbXERH54 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2007 03:57:56 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HoxLX-0004hS-FH for git@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 18 May 2007 09:57:55 +0200 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 18 May 2007 09:57:55 +0200 Received: from J.Sixt by cm56-163-160.liwest.at with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 18 May 2007 09:57:55 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm56-163-160.liwest.at X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Alon Ziv writes: > > > I am referring, for example, to the changes from commit dc380d6, which > > were reverted in Git mainline (actually in "next", they never reached > > Git's "master"). Or to the changes from 4493e36, which had the same > > fate. > > MinGW repository bases its work on my 'next', so it will not be > pulled wholesale to my 'master'. The plan is to trickle down > the platform independent bits of fixes and refactoring to the > mainline, as well as #ifdef __MINGW32__ and $(findstring MINGW) > parts, but that will most likely happen as a series of bite > sized patch series to the list with public reviews. > > I do not know if you mistyped dc380d6 (I do not find it there), > but reverting 4493e36 (merge of jc/3way) was intentional. The > work in that commit that deviates from the mainline is the > jc/3way topic, which turned out to be incomplete and not very > usable. MinGW tree might not have synchronized with the latest > from the mainline in which case it might not have merged the > revert from me yet, and that may be why you are seeing the > differences. Sometime around 1.5.0 I decided to merge only 'master' into MinGW and I didn't notice that there were some more or less important reversals in 'next'. (Note to myself: Pull 079f7cb27b into mingw before next update.) -- Hannes