From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?UmVuw6kgU2NoYXJmZQ==?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-archive: recursive prefix directory creation Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 21:56:59 +0200 Message-ID: <464F568B.9030308@lsrfire.ath.cx> References: <464EE169.30306@lsrfire.ath.cx> <7vbqggy8ym.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Git Mailing List To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat May 19 21:57:23 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HpV3J-0007VD-RI for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 19 May 2007 21:57:22 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764334AbXEST5F convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 May 2007 15:57:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1764348AbXEST5F (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 May 2007 15:57:05 -0400 Received: from static-ip-217-172-187-230.inaddr.intergenia.de ([217.172.187.230]:48713 "EHLO neapel230.server4you.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764334AbXEST5E (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 May 2007 15:57:04 -0400 Received: from [10.0.1.201] (p508E434C.dip.t-dialin.net [80.142.67.76]) by neapel230.server4you.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41D13D009; Sat, 19 May 2007 21:57:02 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) In-Reply-To: <7vbqggy8ym.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano schrieb: > Ren=C3=A9 Scharfe writes: >=20 >> Currently git-archive only adds a single directory entry for prefixe= s, >> e.g. for --prefix=3Da/b/c/ only the directory a/b/c/ would be added = to >> the archive, not a/ nor a/b/. While tar and unzip don't seem to hav= e >> a problem handling these missing entries, their omission was not >> intended. >=20 > Until we start tracking directories (we briefly discussed, and I > think I agree with Linus that it should not be too painful), I'd > rather keep the current behaviour which I feel is more > consistent with what we really are doing. Hmm, fair enough. I started out with a simple cleanup and then I guess went a bit overboard with that overblown path walker. :-] Ren=C3=A9