From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Han-Wen Nienhuys Subject: Re: GIT on MinGW problem Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:16:01 -0300 Message-ID: <465CDE61.40103@xs4all.nl> References: <1dbc01c79432$b4400a80$0200a8c0@AMD2500> <464534EE.30904@xs4all.nl> <4656A304.AF39A0B6@eudaptics.com> <465C064F.B9CE9379@eudaptics.com> <465C1252.9020801@trolltech.com> <465C2516.7040607@trolltech.com> <465C3502.BE134BC9@eudaptics.com> <465C4B0E.C34795B@eudaptics.com> Reply-To: hanwen@xs4all.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy , Johannes Schindelin , Marius Storm-Olsen , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Sixt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed May 30 04:18:30 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HtDld-0001n5-C1 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 30 May 2007 04:18:29 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751011AbXE3CSX (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 May 2007 22:18:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751227AbXE3CSX (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 May 2007 22:18:23 -0400 Received: from smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.32]:2894 "EHLO smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751011AbXE3CSW (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 May 2007 22:18:22 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c911deb6.bhz.virtua.com.br [201.17.222.182]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l4U2IDNt091821 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 30 May 2007 04:18:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hanwen@xs4all.nl) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302) Newsgroups: gmane.comp.version-control.git In-Reply-To: <465C4B0E.C34795B@eudaptics.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Sixt escreveu: >> I'd suggest create a small C wrapper to launch gitk. It would be much >> easier that way IMHO. > > Doh! You're right! It's even there already, right before our eyes: > > pointy..clicky..pointy..clicky (aka: cp gitk git-k) > > $ git k > > :) how about git tk that's more in line what actually happens. We can ship a gitk.bat that runs git-tk. BTW, I got one report that gitk doesn't work with the tcl/tk that I ship. Can I have other reports too? ie. "It doesn't work for me, I use windows 92" "It works for me, I use windows QZ" etc.? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanwen@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen