From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Grimm Subject: StGIT vs. guilt: What's the difference? Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:55:54 -0700 Message-ID: <4671B96A.1080202@midwinter.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: 'git' X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jun 14 23:56:16 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HyxId-0006oY-61 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 23:56:15 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753935AbXFNV4N (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2007 17:56:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753820AbXFNV4L (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2007 17:56:11 -0400 Received: from 91.86.32.216.static.reverse.layeredtech.com ([216.32.86.91]:33061 "HELO midwinter.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752753AbXFNV4E (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2007 17:56:04 -0400 Received: (qmail 5911 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2007 21:56:01 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=200606; d=midwinter.com; b=VN4K0ur4rNwgv2EvZT5Cq2sXdGsjqcw6VRKNBmV22WxrogJt4PclCTLPWCs9ptCR ; Received: from localhost (HELO sgrimm-mbp.local) (koreth@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Jun 2007 21:56:01 -0000 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: I've asked this on IRC a couple times and nobody seemed to have a good answer, so: These two tools seem like they are solving the same general problem using similar approaches. They are both under active development. In what areas is each of them stronger than the other? Why would one choose to use one of them instead of the other? -Steve