git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "René Scharfe" <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 100%
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 14:11:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <467D0DE8.6030104@lsrfire.ath.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706231259021.4059@racer.site>

Johannes Schindelin schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sat, 23 Jun 2007, René Scharfe wrote:
> 
>> Johannes Schindelin schrieb:
>>
>>> By the same reasoning, you could say "never round down to 0%, because 
>>> I want to know when there is no similarity".
>>>
>>> You cannot be exact when you have to cut off fractions, so why try for 
>>> _exactly_ one number?
>> Because completeness is special.
> 
> I am not convinced. My vote is still for the _common_ practice of just 
> rounding. IOW keep it as is.

As I already hinted at, the common result of comparing two files, as
done by e.g. cmp(1), is one bit that indicates equality.  This
information is lost when using up/down rounding, but it is retained when
rounding down.  It's _not_ common to be unable to determine equality
from the result of a file compare.

René

  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-23 12:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-21  3:06 Basename matching during rename/copy detection Shawn O. Pearce
2007-06-21  3:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-06-21  8:00   ` Andy Parkins
2007-06-21  8:07     ` Junio C Hamano
2007-06-21  9:50       ` Andy Parkins
2007-06-21 11:52         ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-06-21 12:44           ` Andy Parkins
2007-06-21 12:53             ` Matthieu Moy
2007-06-21 13:10               ` Jeff King
2007-06-21 13:18               ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-06-21 13:25                 ` Matthieu Moy
2007-06-21 13:52                   ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-06-21 15:37                     ` Steven Grimm
2007-06-21 15:53                       ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-06-21 16:57                         ` Steven Grimm
2007-06-21 13:22             ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-06-21  3:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-21 11:52   ` [PATCH] diffcore-rename: favour identical basenames Johannes Schindelin
2007-06-21 13:19     ` Jeff King
2007-06-21 14:03       ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-06-21 16:20       ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-21 17:52         ` Junio C Hamano
2007-06-21 18:24           ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-22 15:19         ` Andy Parkins
2007-06-22 15:28           ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-06-22 17:51             ` Aidan Van Dyk
2007-06-22  1:14       ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-06-22  5:41         ` Jeff King
2007-06-22 10:22           ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-06-22  7:17         ` Johannes Sixt
2007-06-22 10:39           ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-06-22 10:52             ` 100% (was: [PATCH] diffcore-rename: favour identical basenames) David Kastrup
2007-06-22 12:49               ` Johannes Schindelin
     [not found]                 ` <86abusi1fw.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz>
2007-06-23  1:31                   ` 100% Johannes Schindelin
2007-06-23 10:18                     ` 100% René Scharfe
2007-06-23 10:56                       ` 100% Johannes Schindelin
2007-06-23 11:41                         ` 100% René Scharfe
2007-06-23 12:00                           ` 100% Johannes Schindelin
2007-06-23 12:11                             ` René Scharfe [this message]
2007-06-23 12:21                               ` 100% Johannes Schindelin
2007-06-24 22:23                                 ` 100% René Scharfe
2007-06-23 19:33                         ` 100% Junio C Hamano
2007-06-23 20:41                           ` 100% Johannes Schindelin
2007-06-23  5:44     ` [PATCH] diffcore-rename: favour identical basenames Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=467D0DE8.6030104@lsrfire.ath.cx \
    --to=rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=dak@gnu.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).