From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: most commonly used git commands? Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:29:38 +0200 Organization: eudaptics software gmbh Message-ID: <4683C5D2.FDF4ED02@eudaptics.com> References: <20070625064017.GA2839@mellanox.co.il> <7vlke833wr.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.pobox.com> <20070625071752.GB15343@mellanox.co.il> <81b0412b0706280152g5cbd777y76757d9c608ea483@mail.gmail.com> <4683BDA5.996874EF@eudaptics.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alex Riesen , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jun 28 16:29:22 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I3uzo-0004sp-HC for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:29:20 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755072AbXF1O3S (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:29:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755434AbXF1O3S (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:29:18 -0400 Received: from lilzmailso01.liwest.at ([212.33.55.23]:51476 "EHLO lilzmailso01.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755072AbXF1O3R (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:29:17 -0400 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso01.liwest.at with esmtp (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1I3uzi-0004vJ-KQ; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:29:14 +0200 Received: from eudaptics.com (tethys.linz.eudaptics [192.168.1.88]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627C66EF; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:29:14 +0200 (CEST) X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: AWL=0.027 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Johannes Sixt wrote: > > No. It was meant as Alex said it. Windows (MinGW) doesn't understand > > "chmod a+x blub". > > Yes, I suspected that. But I don't see a need for it on Windows (MinGW) to > begin with. True for Windows-centered projects. But for cross-platform projects --chmod=+x is needed every now and then. AFAIAC, it's alright to fall back to update-index for those occasions, even though they are not that rare due to a deficiency of merge-recursive: When it merges an executable file, it loses the +x bit, even if core.filemode=false! -- Hannes