From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sam Vilain Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix --cherry-pick with given paths Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 02:22:04 +1200 Message-ID: <4693960C.1010906@vilain.net> References: <469378AB.7030909@vilain.net> <4693800F.4010308@vilain.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 10 16:21:53 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I8GbB-0002pu-2b for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:21:53 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752063AbXGJOVu (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:21:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753552AbXGJOVu (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:21:50 -0400 Received: from watts.utsl.gen.nz ([202.78.240.73]:39038 "EHLO magnus.utsl.gen.nz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751606AbXGJOVt (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:21:49 -0400 Received: by magnus.utsl.gen.nz (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 413DA21CECB; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 02:21:48 +1200 (NZST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (203-97-235-49.cable.telstraclear.net [203.97.235.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by magnus.utsl.gen.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F7621CEB2; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 02:21:43 +1200 (NZST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070604) In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on mail.magnus.utsl.gen.nz X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=SPF_HELO_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.0.2 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin wrote: > If you say --cherry-pick, you do not want to see patches which are > in the upstream. If you specify paths with that, what you usually > expect is that only those parts of the patches are looked at which > actually touch the given paths. > > With this patch, that expectation is met. > > Noticed by Sam Vilain. > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin > I just tested this, and it seems to work just like I hoped, so: Signed-off-by: Sam Vilain Sam.