From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sam Vilain Subject: Re: Rewriting history with git-filter-branch and leaking objects (?) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 14:34:38 +1200 Message-ID: <46C7AC3E.5010806@vilain.net> References: <20070817171851.GB13891@glandium.org> <86k5ruxdxz.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <20070817174621.GA14503@glandium.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Kastrup , git@vger.kernel.org To: Mike Hommey X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Aug 19 04:34:44 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IMacl-00024g-Nf for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 04:34:44 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753695AbXHSCeM (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Aug 2007 22:34:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753462AbXHSCeM (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Aug 2007 22:34:12 -0400 Received: from watts.utsl.gen.nz ([202.78.240.73]:59939 "EHLO magnus.utsl.gen.nz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752827AbXHSCeL (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Aug 2007 22:34:11 -0400 Received: by magnus.utsl.gen.nz (Postfix, from userid 65534) id F283F21CFA0; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 14:34:08 +1200 (NZST) Received: from [192.168.1.5] (203-97-235-49.cable.telstraclear.net [203.97.235.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by magnus.utsl.gen.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A199921CF9D; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 14:34:03 +1200 (NZST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070604) In-Reply-To: <20070817174621.GA14503@glandium.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on mail.magnus.utsl.gen.nz X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=SPF_HELO_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.0.2 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Mike Hommey wrote: > Well, with the introduction of git-filter-branch, once you have > rewritten your history and validated that everything is okay, > you might mean to remove the original branch... > Right, but it's probably better to leave a trail. I tend to use refs/Attic/* for branches that I've re-written (if I published them). That way, nothing will send or receive them by default. Sometimes I'll have a "clean" repository which doesn't have any of them for faster initial cloning. Sam.