* Pointers to CVS 2 GIT imports and gateways
@ 2005-05-08 23:16 Martin Langhoff
2005-05-09 4:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Martin Langhoff @ 2005-05-08 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
I am looking into importing a cvs repo HEAD history into git using
cvsps. I read throught the thread where Ingo discussed his import of
the kernel sources, but I couldn't find any pointers to what kind of
shell magic or other associated scripts were used, and google hasn't
helped much either.
How do I feed the patchsets into GIT preserving commit msgs and other metadata?
A related question follows: is anyone running git -> cvs gateways, and how?
pointers to TFM will be much appreciated ;)
cheers,
martin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Pointers to CVS 2 GIT imports and gateways
2005-05-08 23:16 Pointers to CVS 2 GIT imports and gateways Martin Langhoff
@ 2005-05-09 4:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-05-09 5:41 ` Martin Langhoff
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2005-05-09 4:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Langhoff; +Cc: git
Martin Langhoff wrote:
>
> A related question follows: is anyone running git -> cvs gateways, and how?
>
What would be the point? The reason for bkcvs was that bk wasn't
available to everyone.
-hpa
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Pointers to CVS 2 GIT imports and gateways
2005-05-09 4:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
@ 2005-05-09 5:41 ` Martin Langhoff
2005-05-09 13:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Martin Langhoff @ 2005-05-09 5:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H. Peter Anvin; +Cc: git
On 5/9/05, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> What would be the point? The reason for bkcvs was that bk wasn't
> available to everyone.
Ease of transition for other automated tasks, perhaps? I don't know
what bits and pieces of infrastructure hang from the old BK-CVS
changeset distribution infrastructure.
Some projects do count on CVS gateways even if they use smarter SCMs.
This is not just because of licensing issues -- sometimes portability
and preexisting tools trump SCM changes.
regards,
martin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Pointers to CVS 2 GIT imports and gateways
2005-05-09 5:41 ` Martin Langhoff
@ 2005-05-09 13:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2005-05-09 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Langhoff; +Cc: git
Martin Langhoff wrote:
>
> Ease of transition for other automated tasks, perhaps? I don't know
> what bits and pieces of infrastructure hang from the old BK-CVS
> changeset distribution infrastructure.
>
None. That was all owned by Bitmover.
-hpa
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-05-09 13:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-05-08 23:16 Pointers to CVS 2 GIT imports and gateways Martin Langhoff
2005-05-09 4:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-05-09 5:41 ` Martin Langhoff
2005-05-09 13:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).