From: Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add -k kill keyword expansion option to git-cvsimport
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 21:05:01 +1200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46a038f9050815020511574e3d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vr7cv1t89.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On 8/15/05, Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
> I was just wondering if we are limiting options for people who
> want to convert their own CVS repositories by always using
> either -kkv or -ko and nothing else.
I think the other modes are relevant in different scenarios. -kv is
only meaningful as file mode over the life of the file in the repo.
-kk is only meaningful when calling cvs update with -j -j parameters
or cvs diff, and is effectively a synonim of -ko.
In the position we are, getting file/revisions out of a repo, there
are 2 possible files we can get: the one that you'll get with -kkv and
the one you'll get with -ko/-kb. -kb/-ko should give us exactly the
same file, modulo bugs.
I suspect that in practice -kb is more reliable when it comes to
binary files. But to support that the _files() method will need to
handle a slightly different protocol mode on the socket, and I rather
not mess with it unless I can prove its broken. Talking with cvs
servers on the socket is not my idea of fun, and there's all sorts of
version-specific oddities.
cheers,
martin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-15 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-15 6:51 [PATCH] Add -k kill keyword expansion option to git-cvsimport Martin Langhoff
2005-08-15 6:56 ` Martin Langhoff
2005-08-15 7:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-08-15 7:37 ` Martin Langhoff
2005-08-15 7:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-08-15 7:52 ` Martin Langhoff
2005-08-15 8:18 ` Junio C Hamano
[not found] ` <46a038f905081501301bd9a801@mail.gmail.com>
2005-08-15 8:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-08-15 9:05 ` Martin Langhoff [this message]
2005-08-15 11:20 ` Martin Langhoff
2005-08-16 0:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-08-16 11:29 ` Martin Langhoff
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-15 7:10 Martin Langhoff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46a038f9050815020511574e3d@mail.gmail.com \
--to=martin.langhoff@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).