From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Langhoff Subject: Re: FUNKY tags. Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 12:55:18 +1200 Message-ID: <46a038f90508161755b43735c@mail.gmail.com> References: <20050816224332.GE26455@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Aug 17 02:56:31 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E5CDz-0006FI-2D for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 02:56:11 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750784AbVHQAzU (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2005 20:55:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750785AbVHQAzU (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2005 20:55:20 -0400 Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.196]:60885 "EHLO rproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750784AbVHQAzT convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2005 20:55:19 -0400 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so49028rne for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 17:55:19 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=iXtchqUsY9SQxcHn5KoQ9V8H0JUwGlk+lBG2GIaatlJ0uNyIgYMwEcj6jiLGmNCLeTch+a1rKsv4UCvHetJx2d9Z9D1qbny+PuVD7/42RFWmptIbsLcZVokqGViblqcgyb0GgRJUKddgwxAq5wDn4lV4fW0a8dI+s1v07GRR/KI= Received: by 10.38.97.80 with SMTP id u80mr38404rnb; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 17:55:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.101.8 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 17:55:18 -0700 (PDT) To: Dave Jones In-Reply-To: <20050816224332.GE26455@redhat.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 8/17/05, Dave Jones wrote: > I've no idea what I did when I tagged those trees, but according > to a google search, cvsps does that when it find patchsets which > are chronologically (and thus by patchset id) earlier than the tag, > but are tagwise after. Spooky. It's probably tags that were moved around with "cvs tag -F footag". When using cvs in with a dovetail strategy, people tend to merge BRANCH->HEAD and use a floating tag to mark how far it's been merged in. I am somewhat worried about cvsps getting confused by these floating tags. Any help in teaching cvsps to ignore tags is welcome ;) m