From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Langhoff Subject: Re: FUNKY tags. Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:59:41 +1200 Message-ID: <46a038f9050816225944b03dc4@mail.gmail.com> References: <20050816224332.GE26455@redhat.com> <46a038f90508161755b43735c@mail.gmail.com> <20050817024718.GA11734@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Aug 17 08:00:59 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E5Gxo-0002RN-IY for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 07:59:48 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750910AbVHQF7p (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Aug 2005 01:59:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750912AbVHQF7p (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Aug 2005 01:59:45 -0400 Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.195]:11014 "EHLO rproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750909AbVHQF7p convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Aug 2005 01:59:45 -0400 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so82812rne for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 22:59:41 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=CWbeTokMVngS+mN/sQu47DtI/6G3zd61VOqPlsi2bN0IYO6H4dX9zCIWUj7izVP63SJocH90MmNgQB0h66CSr45QR3a+RBufp6cuP8Q6tZqQP/Yckur13mEWRhamowQzR4WmNfHX1HyxvHW81PuDIC8rQ5MyWtVLjIAUJ8JFrEI= Received: by 10.38.209.24 with SMTP id h24mr41809rng; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 22:59:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.101.8 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 22:59:41 -0700 (PDT) To: Dave Jones In-Reply-To: <20050817024718.GA11734@redhat.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 8/17/05, Dave Jones wrote: > In my case, at least the most recent of those cvs tag operations > was just a 'cvs tag x86info-1_14'. Nothing fancy. I'm fairly sure > there was nothing fancy about the earlier instance either. > So sure in fact, I had to look up that -F flag in the man page to find > out what it did. Ok - that reduces the suspects to - a tag applied to only one part of the tree - a tag that took longer to apply than fuzztime (large tree, slow cvs connection?) let me know, and if I find time I may look at the repo. martin