From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Langhoff Subject: Re: Latest cogito broken with bash-3.1 Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:58:00 +1300 Message-ID: <46a038f90512111658x5fe3198ey38515fc2745dd42b@mail.gmail.com> References: <1134220724.15125.4.camel@blade> <20051211001106.GV22159@pasky.or.cz> <1134289867.9541.9.camel@blade> <20051212002631.GW22159@pasky.or.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: Marcel Holtmann , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Dec 12 01:59:29 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Elc10-000104-CW for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 01:58:06 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750950AbVLLA6D (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Dec 2005 19:58:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750995AbVLLA6D (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Dec 2005 19:58:03 -0500 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.199]:45599 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750950AbVLLA6B convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Dec 2005 19:58:01 -0500 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 57so1306452wri for ; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 16:58:00 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dvCdjdoIxynjtfh/BJXcFCGh0sdvcIV6tzHaeVNia2M26vvkqWAZL4YvpESzCUk4Rnk93DSehMAZ0MWo0DSjGFuYGHoPkPyMd88zS2abJNm/GTrxPx1vnPdH1vTicrqbP5QksH/73uW8bt547X+fODE/+ey2h4XJ4y1d2BFaN38= Received: by 10.54.153.18 with SMTP id a18mr125806wre; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 16:58:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.70.12 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 16:58:00 -0800 (PST) To: Petr Baudis In-Reply-To: <20051212002631.GW22159@pasky.or.cz> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 12/12/05, Petr Baudis wrote: > Then that's quite funny, one-line broken pipe message has been always > there (in the past it looked much worse, we thankfully managed to bring > it down to this at least). I assume there's no reasonable workaround to that then? What would take to get rid of that (say, if I had a boring weekend ;)? cheers, m