From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin Langhoff" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Tie it all together: "git log" Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 12:38:53 +1300 Message-ID: <46a038f90602281538m90c4d04pbb6f277e3bec89e8@mail.gmail.com> References: <7vr75nm8cl.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Linus Torvalds" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Mar 01 00:39:07 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FEEQk-0006Ld-JK for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:38:59 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932685AbWB1Xiz (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:38:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932686AbWB1Xiz (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:38:55 -0500 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.198]:24256 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932685AbWB1Xiy convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:38:54 -0500 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so1194wra for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:38:54 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FssOX5+l/L4toRVSwKDoLxX1HORux1S+hALxD9O0Wie3C8DUvzdvRVHqYW2zFqcY/s9rsq4GJolkygMEX/gV6Pm45G/E32m9+3TTB1phNF/L7fJX+EYS4pohfCW5OBhgrBEa2YM0Md+vmnrmgrHqJsOWf0g9EJKCqbIIZ4nh8+k= Received: by 10.54.102.15 with SMTP id z15mr1283343wrb; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:38:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.71.5 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:38:53 -0800 (PST) To: "Junio C Hamano" In-Reply-To: <7vr75nm8cl.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 3/1/06, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I would say we should just rip merge-order out. Who uses it, > and why does it not work with topo-order, again? IIRC archimport uses it, but there's no reason why topo-order wouldn't work. cheers, martin