From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin Langhoff" Subject: Re: git-repack && git-prune-packed isn't doing it's job anymore? Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 14:01:09 +1300 Message-ID: <46a038f90603031701o3f5c948cl1eb05c0f731251b3@mail.gmail.com> References: <46a038f90603031629qbbb287ckd8da1ef56a831dba@mail.gmail.com> <7v64mv2for.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Mar 04 02:01:26 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FFL92-0004oo-FB for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 04 Mar 2006 02:01:17 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751766AbWCDBBN (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Mar 2006 20:01:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751775AbWCDBBN (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Mar 2006 20:01:13 -0500 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.205]:3913 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751766AbWCDBBN convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Mar 2006 20:01:13 -0500 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i30so780181wra for ; Fri, 03 Mar 2006 17:01:12 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bvMrmhoMzU16cbAnSpskIU86EOSeQiZSkYpcqeoYq0mJB2YHoszxFUCWaaWwNSQo8CaENln1oefRyYrpEDSESu3DFE37MhKwtQDH37sMYythWQCGm3hSum5+KiJ2j+bqeBxT9grlWGT4ZDnMInjVHkX5RhQI6ljIam3rr+/w3vM= Received: by 10.54.140.20 with SMTP id n20mr1782022wrd; Fri, 03 Mar 2006 17:01:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.71.5 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Mar 2006 17:01:09 -0800 (PST) To: "Junio C Hamano" In-Reply-To: <7v64mv2for.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 3/4/06, Junio C Hamano wrote: > If that is the case, "git prune" would be the right tool to use. Spot on. Thanks! > And this is not something that changed recently. Of course, my bad. I had not seen this before. I guess it was because I hadn't actually paid much attention at leftover objects in oft-rebased repositories. I used to look at the .git/objects directory a lot in my early git days, when I didn't do any rebasing. thanks again! martin