From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin Langhoff" Subject: Re: cvsserver problem with eclipse? Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 08:38:45 +1200 Message-ID: <46a038f90605011338i5498f857lf230d9a965aa759@mail.gmail.com> References: <4455B863.8040808@mobilereasoning.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon May 01 22:38:56 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FafAP-00040m-Jr for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 22:38:50 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932237AbWEAUir (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 May 2006 16:38:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932239AbWEAUiq (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 May 2006 16:38:46 -0400 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.239]:20687 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932237AbWEAUiq convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 May 2006 16:38:46 -0400 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i21so2149859wra for ; Mon, 01 May 2006 13:38:45 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DEzStePGUcdR1rtr10N8hc9eKWoyh85Oer5GscfrCCidKiZlgfu0bkOQD0XYMmI2BJu4bW5TM3Zutfz2tLmkfqBPN1+vVeTnVX5kL2k5iU9YRSTDOI+n3ZAh7b/qH84DL6IXqmPXeqQdRgwjC6l6VCZ/6klik/do6cFKAa9T1A4= Received: by 10.54.127.13 with SMTP id z13mr1171984wrc; Mon, 01 May 2006 13:38:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.127.4 with HTTP; Mon, 1 May 2006 13:38:45 -0700 (PDT) To: "Bill Burdick" In-Reply-To: <4455B863.8040808@mobilereasoning.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 5/1/06, Bill Burdick wrote: > OK, I changed the way I was testing this to match your usage plan and I > still got the same results. It works just fine for vanilla CVS; cvs > status shows the re revision in the repo and cvs update brings it in. That's a good start! > Eclipse has the same funky behavior: Compare with latest at the project > level shows no differences, but compare with latest on the changed file > actually does an update instead of popping up the Eclipse diff viewer. Hmmm. Eclipse does some weird funky sh*t sometimes. Can you ask it to get you a log? There's an option in Eclipse CVS control settings that will enable logging of cvs commands to the console. Enable it, and then start Eclipse from the commandline, piping stderr and stdout to a logfile. There are also some weird differences depending on how you ask for the update or diff. I hate doing this but I'll have to ask you to tell me exactly how you ask for the diff and for the update. And the platform you are running Eclipse on. > By the way, I had trouble at first accessing the repo with SSH because > of permissions on the sqlite db. I'm not totally sure about the > implications for multiple users, but maybe just using a common group > will work fine? Yes, a common group is the thing to do. $ chgrp gitusers *sqlite $ chmod g+w *sqlite > I'm really happy with git and git-cvsserver! I'm hoping to be able to > standardize on it for our Eclipse work. It seems like it should be Great to hear that! cheers, martin