From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin Langhoff" Subject: git-format-patch builtin isn't using git-cherry? Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:32:01 +1200 Message-ID: <46a038f90606221732k6d93bcceic2761081d7a7c72b@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jun 23 02:32:17 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FtZah-00029O-9e for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 02:32:08 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932230AbWFWAcE (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jun 2006 20:32:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932734AbWFWAcE (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jun 2006 20:32:04 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.174]:56797 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932230AbWFWAcD (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jun 2006 20:32:03 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id a2so773289ugf for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 17:32:01 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=DKFw038nfw9VOAc3pcqJ6X1RsRpXJnSbdV50bIcfCONRqblX2wZqSlaFU1/NWTQkz+1nLqy5ykLSlAWTrVOhykWxYNkgCdsoY0dwDW7nt7HV+YSKHV59GlLDOSsy+XTf1HB5S26XYjgDCT0k3weLXsaKsi2NedgndtKMLx9ZHe4= Received: by 10.78.139.5 with SMTP id m5mr1092559hud; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 17:32:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.117.11 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 17:32:01 -0700 (PDT) To: git Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: I used to rely on git-format-patch to be calling git-cherry in the bg, so that I'd know that the obviously merged patches were upstream alredy. It doesn't seem to do it any more. Reading cmd_format_patch() in builtin-log.c, it seems to have lost that magic that made it so useful... :( Can a kind soul that speaks C fluently help me out here? (The new format-patch gives me 180 patches to merge/rebase, where the old one tells me there's only 51. guess which one I prefer ;-) ) cheers, m