From: "Martin Langhoff" <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
To: "Andre Masella" <andre@masella.no-ip.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Repository Security
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:46:28 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46a038f90701221546n7a956a31n936aacb1c979730e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200701221433.13257.andre@masella.no-ip.org>
On 1/23/07, Andre Masella <andre@masella.no-ip.org> wrote:
> As I understand it, none of the repository backends allow any per-user
> per-branch access control. SSH and HTTP come the closest with the right
> hooks, but since the repository is writeable by those users, there is little
> to stop them from changing the repository directly.
For this kind of scenario, use one repo per developer with GIT+SSH. It
changes your usage pattern slightly (pull from all repos before push)
but this is easy to setup. And you can even enforce the "won't let you
push unless you are up-to-date with the other repositories" via a
fancy pre-update hook script on the repo.
Or you may chose to have an integration repo _as well_ as public per-dev repos.
> So, before I start, I would like to get ideas from others...or be told this is
> a waste of time. Thanks.
Not entirely a waste of time, but there is a very git-style way of
addressing this that will probably save you time...
martin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-22 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-22 19:33 Repository Security Andre Masella
2007-01-22 20:53 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-01-23 13:23 ` Andre Masella
2007-01-22 23:46 ` Martin Langhoff [this message]
2007-01-23 9:41 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-01-23 13:23 ` Andre Masella
2007-01-23 14:29 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-01-23 15:00 ` Andy Parkins
2007-01-23 11:06 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-01-23 13:23 ` Andre Masella
2007-01-23 21:38 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-01-24 9:31 ` Andreas Ericsson
2007-01-23 16:18 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46a038f90701221546n7a956a31n936aacb1c979730e@mail.gmail.com \
--to=martin.langhoff@gmail.com \
--cc=andre@masella.no-ip.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).